Go module
github.com/foxcpp/maddy
check_circle
arrow_drop_downv0.7.1
Default versionwarning
Warning
We found errors while resolving dependencies that may result in an incomplete or inaccurate dependency graph.
Show details
- could not find module for package import: blitiri.com.ar/go/spf
Security Advisories
5
In the dependencies
Similar advisories
Golang protojson.Unmarshal function infinite loop when unmarshaling certain forms of invalid JSON
7.5 MODERATE·GHSA-8r3f-844c-mc37
Similar advisories
net/http, x/net/http2: close connections when receiving too many headers
5.3 MODERATE·GHSA-4v7x-pqxf-cx7m
Similar advisories
go-retryablehttp can leak basic auth credentials to log files
6 MODERATE·GHSA-v6v8-xj6m-xwqh
Similar advisories
Misuse of ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback may cause authorization bypass in golang.org/x/crypto
9.1 CRITICAL·GHSA-v778-237x-gjrc
Similar advisories
Non-linear parsing of case-insensitive content in golang.org/x/net/html
HIGH·GHSA-w32m-9786-jp63
Package metadata as of .
Projects
foxcpp/maddy
GitHub
✉️ Composable all-in-one mail server.
call_split 260 forks
star 5k stars
OpenSSF scorecard
The Open Source Security Foundation is a cross-industry collaboration to improve the security of open source software (OSS). The Scorecard provides security health metrics for open source projects.
View information about checks and how to fix failures.
Score
4.6/10
Scorecard as of .
Dangerous-Workflow
10/10
Determines if the project's GitHub Action workflows avoid dangerous patterns.
Reasoning
no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Code-Review
2/10
Determines if the project requires human code review before pull requests (aka merge requests) are merged.
Reasoning
Found 5/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Token-Permissions
0/10
Determines if the project's workflows follow the principle of least privilege.
Reasoning
detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Maintained
4/10
Determines if the project is "actively maintained".
Reasoning
4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Security-Policy
4/10
Determines if the project has published a security policy.
Reasoning
security policy file detected
Binary-Artifacts
10/10
Determines if the project has generated executable (binary) artifacts in the source repository.
Reasoning
no binaries found in the repo
CII-Best-Practices
0/10
Determines if the project has an OpenSSF (formerly CII) Best Practices Badge.
Reasoning
no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Fuzzing
0/10
Determines if the project uses fuzzing.
Reasoning
project is not fuzzed
License
10/10
Determines if the project has defined a license.
Reasoning
license file detected
Signed-Releases
8/10
Determines if the project cryptographically signs release artifacts.
Reasoning
4 out of the last 4 releases have a total of 4 signed artifacts.
Pinned-Dependencies
0/10
Determines if the project has declared and pinned the dependencies of its build process.
Reasoning
dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Branch-Protection
3/10
Determines if the default and release branches are protected with GitHub's branch protection settings.
Reasoning
branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
Packaging
10/10
Determines if the project is published as a package that others can easily download, install, easily update, and uninstall.
Reasoning
packaging workflow detected
SAST
0/10
Determines if the project uses static code analysis.
Reasoning
SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities
4/10
Determines if the project has open, known unfixed vulnerabilities.
Reasoning
6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Project metadata as of .